Sep 13 2011
Redistricting in Texas Leads to Court Disputes
In San Antonio, Texas, a court battle rages on over whether Republican lawmakers who redrew the borders for districts in the Texas House and Congress, did so in a way that discriminated against voters from minority groups. Several minority coalitions banded together to sue the state, as defense attorneys argue that it was politics that determined the new district lines rather than issues of race or ethnicity.
The lawsuit centers on the the accusation that the new district maps were drawn with the intention of weakening the power of Hispanic and black voters, who, coincidentally, are statistically more likely to vote Democrat than Republican. In the past ten years, the Hispanic population in Texas has grown by leaps and bounds, and given the percentage change in the new census data, Texas will be receiving four new seats in Congress.
The Voting Rights Act defends against redistricting in a way that would split up districts containing mostly minority residents. The current lawsuit, which was originally several lawsuits that have now been combined into one, maintains that the Voting Rights Act has been ignored in this instance, and that the new district lines unfairly benefit whites and Republican voters. Representatives of the state’s map redrawing committee have argued that the growth of the hispanic population in Texas has not been in specific areas, but rather has been spread throughout the state.
Deputy attorney general David Schenck defended the redistricting borders, pointing out that any theoretical demonstration of discrimination due to the redistricting is not enough to allow the lawsuit to be successful. In order for the plaintiffs to prevail, they have to show that there was discriminatory intent, which Schenck claims was not there. Aside from the racial and ethnic concerns, Democrats have asserted that the redistricting has broken up areas where a majority of residents vote Democrat, such as in Austin, which is now divided into five separate d